Showing posts with label Green Building. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Green Building. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

ANNOUNCING THE VG2 - GARDENER HANDBOOK SERIES

ANNOUNCING THE VG2 - GARDENER HANDBOOK SERIES

We have created a new blog entirely focused to our coming Gardeners' Handbooks and How To Series.

You can find it here:
http://vg2gardenerhandbook.blogspot.com/
Best is to start with the following post:

This blog will be used exclusively to announce the publication of the different parts of our "Victory Gardens 2.0" and "Victory Gardening 2" general "Gardener Handbook", a collection of practical "How To" focused Handbooks. The list of which you can find here: http://vg2gardenerhandbook.blogspot.com/2009/01/vg2-gardener-handbooks-in-making.html . Links to download them at no costs will be provided there.



We also recommend you visit our sibbling blog from time to time at:
http://victorygardening2.blogspot.com/





[VG-HAnn-V101] PERMALINK - The permanent link for the present post is: http://victorygardens2.blogspot.com/2009/01/announcing-vg2-gardener-handbook-series.html

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

VICTORY GARDENING 2 & VICTORY GARDENS 2 FAQ

VICTORY GARDENING 2.0 & VICTORY GARDENS 2.0 FAQ

We will add from time to time to this FAQ. If you wish to have a specific question addressed, please ask us in email, or simply by using a "comment".

Q - Can I use herbicides, pesticides, GMOs, etc, in Victory Gardening?

A - Short answer: Not likely! Sure, you "can" do anything, including take a gun, put it in your mouth, and pull the trigger. It's up to you.

However, is it wise to do so? Most people would disagree. At any rate, the Gardening equivalent of such action, even if done in slow motion -- since it will take you a lot longer to achieve your clearly stated goal, has obviously little to do with "Victory Gardening". So, no, you can't do both.

But you can certainly pretend to garden, and use poisons as much as you want.

However, you certainly cannot get into "Victory Gardening", and poison the Earth and yourself. These things are simply incompatible.


Plus, why would you want to, anyway? If you want to eat crap, your local supermarket is full of it. Since it's available at no effort to you, why not just go, and buy it?

Aping "conventional" agriculture will produce the same results as it does in matters of health, sustainability, environmental impact, etc. If that's what you seek, consider that Agribusiness is much better at it than you will ever be! So, rather than getting into "gardening", why not consider becoming a shareholder of a certain company in St Louis which is on a mission to destroy the planet? And enjoy the ride... While you can!

Now if bugs in the garden are your problem, there are many, many quite efficient natural ways to handle them. So why not learn what these ways are?

At any rate, the occasional bug is of course common, but bug infestations are a rarity in a properly designed "Edible Ecosystem" or "Edible Landscape". The wide variety of plants concentrated in a small area make such problems quite unlikely. To begin with, your garlic and onions and other aromatic plants are going to work for you on an on-going basis...

Bottom line: If you do it right, you won't need any man-made poisons. Period.
But of course, if you believe in them for religious or other reasons, again, it's all just up to you! No one can stop you of using them. Just ask yourself first, though: Is eating poisoned food *really* what I want?

When answering that question, remember Dr Otto Warburg, the only physician to ever get TWO Nobels in Physiology and Medicine, and the "Warburg Imperative".



Q - What is the view of cutting-edge architects and builders about the idea of Green Buildings, Green Roofs, and Personal Organic Gardening?
A - Here too, things are changing, and for the better!
For example, on January 21st, 2009, Ian Ritchie, Royal Academician and Professor of Architecture at the Royal Academy of Arts (in the United Kingdom), concluded his speech about a new design paradigm in Architecture organized by USC (the University of Southern California) by a call to organize cities around sustainable community units, of which locally grown food, such as those promoted as Sustainable Organic Gardens, would be part of the new structure.
One of the most successful and outstanding architects of his generation, Ian Ritchie is best known for his leading participation in major government-sponsored projects in France, such as the Cité des Sciences and Parc at La Villette, the Louvre Pyramids with IM Pei, etc, and his creative use of cutting-edge low-energy concepts, materials and technology; as well as his design and construction influence in the political arenas of UK government.
For those in the know, it is extremely significant that a man of his stature supports the ambitions of Victory Gardening and similar ideas and developments.

In our opinion, such support will make it increasingly difficult for local and state governments to continue dragging their feet about sustainability and the necessity of widely embracing the concepts behind Victory Gardening 2.0. This is, indeed, very good news!
In fact, here too change is in the air. For example, in Los Angeles, the Mayor, Antonio Villaraigosa, seems in the process of expressing an increasing interest in "Green Solutions" that truly make a difference.


Q - Are there SUCCESSFUL MODELS FOR VICTORY GARDENING 2.0?

A - There are many. For example, just visit the website maintained by the Dervaes family in Pasadena, California, about their own personal experience in Victory Gardening. You can find it at:

More, and curiously enough, an entire nation can be cited as such an example, and the irony of it is that it was once the very model of the most unsustainable "bully-type" conventional agriculture, since it was a centralized communist showcase, relying almost entirely on artificial fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, antibiotics, hormones, and the like: Cuba.

After the fall of the Soviet regime in Russia, Cuba was cut off all the goodies of conventional agricultural coming from Big Oil, in this case, Soviet Big Oil. How they adapted, and the results of it, makes for a very interesting case to study.

Particularly with oil at $50 a barrel and gas at $2 a gallon, and the perspective to see them again at $150 a barrel and $4 or $5 a gallon, and more, as undoubtedly will be the case again soon, after the unavoidable final collapse of the dollar predicted by all experts, including by people such as legendary investor Warren Buffett himself.



Q - What is the "Warburg Imperative"?

A - A commandment we should all obey!
Shortly before their death, Pr.Dr. Otto Warburg, Head of the Department of Cell Physiology at the Kaiser-Wilhelm and later Max-Planck Institute in Berlin, the only physician who ever got two Nobels in Medicine and Physiology for his work on Cell Physiology and Cancer, met with Amb. Dr. Hans von Reichmann, who was at the time the highest ranking civil servant in the service of the European country of Austria.

They reminisced about their lives, the war, the more and more sorry state of the world, and speculated about where it was going (that is, where we are right now) and what to do about it.

Among many other subjects, the conversation got on food. Dr Warburg was well-known for basically refusing to eat any food that wasn't organically grown or raised in his own garden or the garden of people he personally knew and trusted, which obviously, at the time, made him the target of quite many a joke among his colleagues, and such.

During that conversation, Dr Warburg intimated that for anyone who wanted to be and remain healthy, there was no higher imperative, whatever it took, than creating and maintaining their own Organic Garden, and eating from it, as much as was humanely possible. Or teaming up with other people, partaking to and benefitting from the creation and maintenance of such a Garden.

And that as far as he knew, man-made chemicals were not only the trigger for most cancers, but also the ultimate causes of most if not all "modern" ailments.

Dr. v. Reichmann reported this conversation to Andre Birre, (the seminal author of "Humus, Health and Wealth of the Earth", founder of the "Organisation for the Service of Life", "Save the Earth" and "Nature and Progress" - now the Certification Authority for Organic Agriculture in several countries in Europe and Africa), and to Dr. Annenberg and other team members at the OSL, who all took both the idea and the mandate very seriously.

This has been known since as "The Warburg Imperative".

Even if, under the guise of advertising, the "mainstream" media and the secular arms of Agribusiness, Big Oil, Big Pharma, and the like, buries us under propaganda to the contrary, including with such total absurdities as that there are no problems at all with artificial hormones, antibiotics and GMOs in our food, the "Warburg Imperative" is clear, easy to comprehend, and simple to follow.

It is even more valid today than it was in the early 70's, as there were no GMOs in the 60's and 70's.

Whether you have the wisdom to follow the Warburg Imperative, though, is again entirely up to you. However, before you make a decision, perhaps just remember who Pr.Dr. Otto Warburg was, and what he advised us to do.



[VG2-FAQ-V102] PERMALINK - The permanent link for the present post is:

Saturday, January 24, 2009

SERENDIPITOUS TIMES

SERENDIPITOUS TIMES

Times of Crisis are times of Change.
And when what exists is not that satisfying, times of Change hold great promises.

In our own experience, how things fall together nowadays is sometimes nothing shortly of amazing. As we develop this post, we will give some examples of this. In any event, it is now clear that...

The time has truly come for a "General Greening".


Greening our lives, our communities, and our Host Planet, the Earth.

Greening of the way we build, we live, we interact with each other and our environments, as well as with our Host Planet, the Earth, as a whole.


The present webpage will be dedicated in exploring examples of synchronicity and fortunate and/or sometimes remarkable events, working toward a greening of our lives and of the Planet. Exemplifying conjunctions of people or circumstances we perhaps wouldn't have thought normally possible.

Definitely, things are changing.

Let's make sure the Change in the air is for the better!


[To better understand the points we are making, please read our FAQ at: http://victorygardens2.blogspot.com/2009/01/victory-gardens-20-faq.html ]


[VG2-ST-V101] PERMALINK - The permanent link for the present post is:

Friday, January 23, 2009

OUR GOALS - GREEN BUILDINGS & GREEN LIVING

OUR GOALS - GREEN BUILDINGS & GREEN LIVING


TGB - TRULY GREEN BUILDINGS:

The energy and carbon footprint of a "truly green building" is essentially ZERO. Plus, water is no more wasted, but rather immediately recycled on the spot to feed surrounding and integrated building vegetation. Water run-off is allowed to percolate and/or captured, stored for vegetation use when possible.

This is not pure theory. It can be done: Some of the current policies of the City of Santa Monica, CA, go in these precise directions.

WHAT IT MEANS: This does not mean, of course, that when it comes to human dwellings or business buildings, no external energy is ever used, or no carbon is ever emitted. This just means that when energy use and emissions are considered over a longer period of time, say a year or more, the sums actually equal or near ZERO. Or perhaps are even positive: More energy is produced than used, more carbon absorbed than emitted.

How is this achieved? By generating energy on the spot (photovoltaic, passive solar, wind or geothermal when possible, new energy, etc) and by using construction methods and/or retrofitting that fully integrate suitable vegetation, that contributes to achieving the overall goals. For example, roofs of old should become a dying specie, systematically replaced by "true green roofs" (TGR).

"Truly Green Buildings" should and in their time will become the goal of public policy. First, supported by fiscal approaches, and ultimately, mandated by law for newly constructed personal dwellings, and to the extent practical, for business buildings.

Helping in making these changes happen is more and more becoming the mark of all people with ecological awareness and social consciousness. Sure, politicians are still lagging, but this is one of the matters where concerned citizenry can truly make its weight felt. After all, marginal shifts in electoral patterns can have very clear impact on those who would not get the message in time. And most likely, will.
There is no need for us as a society to put up with politicians who don't "get it", or drag their feet in the services of the corporate interests who paid for their elections. This is particularly true in our local communities. "City Hall" is the easiest part to clean up, of the whole mess.

We should also encourage the creation and uses of new building materials and techniques adapted to the goal of green building and green living. For example, there are great promises in the area of cast earth, prefabricated foam concrete panels, and the like. And in general, in using "earth" and local soil components in our buildings, for example as fillings in prefabricated panels. Certainly, "adobe" is not exactly a new discovery, but there are many news ways of doing old things that only modern technologies could afford us.

In any event, in the end, it is clear that our current conceptions of building and living in these buildings, and the techniques we used to that end, should be *totally reinvented* in accordance with the goal of "truly building green", which to a large extent will determine if we can "truly live green".


TGR - TRUE GREEN ROOFS:

If you think of it, roofs are truly what make a dwelling. The roof of a family dwelling, and of a commercial building as well when suitable, as we see it, should carry soil and be planted, as a rule with edible landscaping and food croops. These, at some time in a near future, will as a rule be attended by automated gardening systems.

Whatis important is to always keep in mind the superior qualities of such roofs when it comes to building insulation, and building functionality. And the fantastic difference they could make in our environmental and ecological footprints.

Working on slowly but surely making green roofs a standard, rather than a very rare exception, is our stated goal. As well as studying and promoting the best ways to retrofit existing buildings with green roofs.

TGRs would represent an immense leap forward. They must first become a standard option for new buildings, and then slowly be developed into a mandate for them, as technology and know-how is developed.


TGL - TOTALLY GREEN LIVING:

Totally Green Living should also become our goal.

Besides the question of local energy use and generation, a standard human family dwelling should produce at least 90% the food used there on the spot in an organic and sustainable manner, recycling all organic waste on the spot, and reducing all other waste to marginal levels.

More, using modern technology to start working where we live should and certainly will become a standard. Commuting is clearly an enormous and nowadays mostly useless waste of time, energy and money. Coming with an increasingly inacceptable environmental footprint.


TGT - TRULY GREEN TECHNOLOGY :

To achieve these goals, we should resolutely embrace the use of corresponding advanced technologies. What comes immediately to mind is encouraging the obsolescence of the idea of "commuting to work", when most tasks could more efficiently be addressed from the places where we live.

But there are many more possible developments.

For example, there are great promises in developping localised energy-generation using new energy technologies. Even if, of course, there are huge societal obstacles to such developments, as this could be perceived as a treat for existing energy oligopolies.

At a more practical level, today, the level of cheap computing power we have achieved would permit to create cost-effective household robotized units.

These could to a large extent change the way we interact with our immediate environments. For example, allowing to have many simple and repetitive task necessary when growing plants totally automatised, using what could be called "Garden Robotics".

Considering the enormous amounts of time, energy, water and money wasted on maintaining mostly useless lawns, such approaches hold great promises for the future. And since developping them should actually be profitable business, there is a good chance that we will see such development happen soon.


GREEN BUILDING AND GREEN LIVING IS NOT ONLY POSSIBLE, BUT IT IS A PRACTICAL CHOICE WE CAN ALL MAKE TODAY, TOWARD A MUCH MORE RATIONAL, SUSTAINABLE AND COST-EFFECTIVE WAY OF LIVING.

MAKING THE CORRESPONDING CHOICES NOW WILL COMES WITH SUBSTANTIAL POSITIVE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE QUALITY OF OUR LIVES, OUR ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINTS, AND OUR LOCAL AND PLANETARY ENVIRONMENT.

Making these choices is what we advocate everyone should consider doing, at both the personal and collective level.

Since everything we do always can only start with ourselves, YOU should consider making these choices, and advocating them with friends and family and in your own community. In your own self-interest, the interest of your own community, and the interest of our host planet as a whole.

[VG2-TG-V103] PERMALINK - The permanent link for the present post is: http://victorygardens2.blogspot.com/2009/01/our-goals-green-buildings-green-living.html